Thursday, January 29, 2015

The world in which you exist is the product of ignorance.+



You cannot get rid of the illusion you are not the Self.  You are the false self within the false experience. You and your world are part and parcel of the illusion.

First, you have to realize the ‘Self’ is not you but the ‘Self’ is the Soul, which is present in the form of the consciousness. It is the Soul that is in ignorance. It is the Soul that is experiencing the dualistic illusion ( the world,  in which you exist) as a reality.  When the Soul wakes up in its own awareness the ignorance vanishes then the illusory reality (the world, in which you exist) never again remains as a reality. 

The one, which is born, lives, and dies, is not the Soul.  The Soul, the Self, never dies, it lives eternally. The Soul never comes or goes. Whatever comes and goes is merely an illusion.   From the standpoint of the Soul birth, life, death, and the world is merely an illusion.  Thus, Self-realization is necessary to realize the experience of birth, life, death, and the world is merely an illusion

Remember:~

All likes and dislikes are of the ego. All good and bad belong to the ego. The desires belong to the ego.   The ego belongs to the duality. The duality is merely an illusion. Your body and your experience of the world belong to the ego.  The ego, the body, and the world appear together and disappear together.  

All the doubts and confusion are only from the dualistic perspective. There are no doubts or confusion from the non-dualistic perspective. In Self-awareness, there is unity in diversity in consciousness. In physical awareness, there is diversity in consciousness.  
The seeker has to be always aware of this truth! Everything within the dualistic illusion is merely an illusory division created within consciousness.

The error is in observing the worldview.  Egocentric observation yields objective awareness.  Soulcentric observation leads to Advaitic awareness in the midst of diversity. Thus, Self-knowledge or Brahma Gnana or Atma Gnana leads to Advaitic awareness.

The Soul is the Self. The Soul is present in the form of consciousness. The nature of the consciousness is awareness.
You and your experience of the world disappear when the waking experience disappears. The waking experience disappears in deep sleep. The dream disappears when the waking takes place. There is neither the waking nor the dream in deep sleep.
The seeker has to find out ‘what is it’ that’ becomes the waking or dream (duality) and ‘what is it that becomes the deep sleep (nonduality).

Remember:~

The one that becomes the dual (waking or dream) and that one that becomes non-dual (deep sleep) is the formless Soul, which is present in the form of consciousness. The Soul is the Self. In the realm of the Soul, diversity has no value because there is unity in diversity in the consciousness.
All three states are made of single stuff. Realizing that single Stuff, which is the Soul is Self-knowledge or Brahma Gnana or Atma Gnana.
If the Soul is the Self then the world in which you exist is merely an illusion. The world is a reality on the base of the ego (you), which is the false self within the false experience.
The world in which you exist is the product of ignorance. When ignorance vanishes the unreal nature of the world n which you exist is exposed. In the same way, the unreal nature of the dream was exposed when the waking takes place. Ignorance vanishes when Advaitic wisdom dawns.
A perfect understanding, and assimilation of ‘what is ‘what helps to remove all your confusion and doubts.
That is why Sage Sankara Says: ~ V.63~ "Without knowing and examining the external world, one can’t know the Truth, as the idea that the external world exists, won't go. It can go only by an inquiry into the nature of the external world.
The Soul, the Self reveals ‘what is real’ and ‘what is unreal” when the seeker is receptive and ready.
It takes time for the subconscious to gain speed; it takes time for the Soul to awake, and it takes time for the Soul which has been in the sleep of ignorance to wake up to its own awareness.:~Santthosh Kumaar  

There is nothing that is not God.+



Kabir says: ~   instead of finding fault and maligning others dive deep into your own Self. Amazingly an honest introspection will reveal that all fault lies with  " Me " and " My "own perceptions and attitudes. If there is any evil or crookedness it is in  " Me". Correcting this and changing to a loving and compassionate attitude will change one's perception and then the world will appear wonderful all over again. 

The famous peace invocation of Isa Upanishad says: ~  Om Purna- madah, purna-midam purnat-purnam-udacyate  Purnaysa purna-madaya purna-meva-vasisyate

This means ~ All this is full /from fullness, Fullness comes when fullness is taken from fullness/ Fullness still remains.

 This belief is all-comprehensive and all-absorbing. There is nothing that is not God.

Rig-Veda 1-164-46 and Y.V 32-1 clearly mention that God is “One”.

Rig Veda: ~ 'Prajnanam Brahma'- Consciousness is the ultimate reality or Brahman or God in truth.

God in truth is the Atman, the Self. Atman is present in the form of consciousness.

Do not accept any other God other than Atman not worship other than Atman.

Let these words be inscribed in your subconscious.

Nothing is real but God. Nothing Matters but love for God in truth. God in truth is everywhere and in everything.

God in truth is hidden by the illusory universe. God in truth alone is and all else is an illusion

Rig Veda: ~ The Atman is the cause; Atman is the support of all that exists in this universe. May ye never turn away from the Atman, the Self.   May ye never accept another God in place of the Atman nor worship other than the Atman ?" ( 10:48, 5)

Yajur Veda also says:~  God has no image and His name is Holy.  (32.3)”

Mythreyi Upanishad 2:26 says:~  All those who desire to have salvation without taking several births, should worship God in spirit and truth.  

Bhagavad Gita says: ~ “Don't unsettle the minds of the ignorant by revealing the esoteric truth."

Bhagavad Gita: ~ Brahmano hi pratisthaham Brahman (God) is considered the all-pervading consciousness which is the basis of all the animate and inanimate entities and material. (Gita 14.27)

The Upanishads say in effect that: ~ if you believe that you are one and God  (Brahman) is another you cannot understand Truth.

Brihad Upanishad: ~ “If you think there is another entity, whether man or God there is no truth."

Lord Krishna Says Ch. V:~ Those who know me in truth.". The last two words (tattvataha) are usually ignored by pundits, but they make all the difference between the ordinary concept of God and the truth about God.

Bhagavad Gita says:~  Among thousands of men, scarcely one strives for perfection,  and of those who strive and succeed, scarcely one knows the Self in truth.

Meher Baba said:~  God is your innermost Self.  Do not search for God outside of you.  Let these words be inscribed in your heart. Nothing is real but God. Nothing Matters but love for God. God is everywhere and does everything. God is beyond us and is everything. God alone is and all else is an illusion.

Santthosh Kumaar:- To know what is God we must know what the  Self is. In deeper Self -search we become aware of the fact that our body, ego and our experience of the universe are created out of single stuff, which is consciousness or the Soul.  Due to ignorance, we identify the Soul with the body and we become egocentric.  

When we become aware of the fact that, the ‘Self’ is not the form but the ‘Self’ is formless then we become Soul -centric and realize the fact that all the three states are merely an illusion created out of consciousness.  Thus, consciousness is the ultimate truth. Consciousness is the real Self.    

Thus, we have to share and interact with fellow seekers and move ahead and reach the nondual destination through this mental (inner) journey.:~Santthosh Kumaar 

Yogis and Gurus are not Gods. Rig Veda gives a clear idea of what is supposed to be the God, then why worship which is not God.+



The Guru worship is meant for the ignorant populace. For those who have chosen the path of wisdom, there is no need to follow Guru or worship the Guru as God.
The ‘Self’ is bodiless because the ‘Self is a formless, timeless, and spaceless existence. The ‘Self is not you but the ‘Self’ is the Soul. From the standpoint of the Soul, the world in which you exist is merely an illusion.
You and your Guru exist within the dualistic illusion. Performing the Pada Pooja (feet worship) to Advaitin Gurus, you will not get Advaitic wisdom.
A Guru who preaches conduct as the means to freedom believes in the experience of birth, life death, and the world as a reality, whereas the Advaitic Sage Sankara declares the world as unreal. Therefore, how actions performed in the unreal world can get moksha or freedom. Therefore there is a need to know the fact that, you are not the Self but the ‘Self’ is the Soul in order to understand and assimilate and realize the truth beyond the form, time, and space.
People think when they meet a Guru they get instant enlightenment because many people have experienced it. Such instant enlightenment is not wisdom but a hallucination.
And such enlightenment or any experience of that sort is temporary. There is no doubt people must have experienced but what they experienced is a mere hallucination. Experience implies duality. Experience is possible within form, time, and space.
The Guru is useless so long as the ultimate truth is unknown, and the Guru is equally useless when the ultimate truth or Brahman has already been known.
A guru is needed in the religious and the yogic path. There is no need for a Guru to acquire Self-knowledge.
Sage Sankara clearly indicates in Viveka Chudamani (2) that the Knower of the Atman (A Gnani) "bears no outward mark of a holy man." (Stanza 539).
So, Sage Sankara clearly indicates A Gnani "bears no outward mark of a holy man" then why hold Gurus and Yogis who identify themselves as holy men.
From the Advaitic perspective, A Gnani never identifies himself as a Guru or a Yogi or someone disciple. The one who accepts himself as a Guru or someone’s disciple is not a Gnani.
Ashtavakra Samhita: ~ "The man of knowledge (Gnani), though living like an ordinary man, is contrary to him and only those like him understand his state.
In Self-awareness, ignorance vanishes, and the unreal nature of the form, time, and space are exposed. In Self-awareness (in the midst of duality), the body is not considered a body, the ego is not considered as ego the world is not considered as the world because everything is created out of single stuff. That single stuff is consciousness (Soul). A Gnani is one who has realized everything is consciousness (Brahman). There is no second thing that exists other than consciousness.
Remember:~
Yogis and Gurus are not Gods. 

This idea of worshiping Gurus is not a Vedic idea but adopted from Jainism and Buddhism. 

Vedas bars human worship: ~

"They are enveloped in darkness, in other words, are steeped in ignorance and sunk in the greatest depths of misery who worship the uncreated, eternal Prakriti -- the material cause of the world ~ in place of the All-pervading God, But those who worship visible things born of the Prakriti, such as the earth, trees, bodies (human and the like) in place of God are enveloped in still greater darkness, in other words, they are extremely foolish, fall into an awful hell of pain and sorrow, and suffer terribly for a long time.":~  (Yajur Veda 40:9.)

When Veda says worshiping human bodies in place of God are enveloped in still greater darkness, in other words, they are extremely foolish, fall into an awful hell of pain and sorrow, and suffer terribly for a long time.

When there is a clear idea of what is supposed to be God then why worship what is not God. 

Yajurveda – chapter- 32:~    God is Supreme Spirit has no ‘Pratima’ (idol) or material shape. He cannot be seen directly by anyone. He pervades all beings and all directions. 

Thus,   Idolatry does not find any support from the Vedas.

Rig Veda: ~ 'Prajnanam Brahma'- Consciousness is the ultimate reality or Brahman or God in truth.

God in truth is the Atman, the Self. Atman is present in the form of consciousness.

Do not accept any other God other than Atman not worship other than Atman.

Let these words be inscribed in your subconscious.

Nothing is real but God. Nothing Matters but love for God in truth. God in truth is everywhere and in everything.

God in truth is hidden by the illusory universe. God in truth alone is and all else is an illusion

Rig Veda: ~ May ye never accept another God in place of the Atman nor worship other than the Atman

So, it clearly indicates that God is formless thus there is no scope for a form-based God. The religion and its ideas of Gods, and its theories of karma, heaven, hell, papa, Punya, rebirth, and reincarnation are based on the false self (ego), within the false experience (waking). Therefore, they are meant for lower mindsets, they are of no use for those who are seeking higher truth as indicated in the scriptures.  : ~ Santthosh Kumaar

Vedas are not the important sacred scriptures for the Hindus.+



                   As one peep into the annals of religious history, one finds:~ 


 As we peep into the annals of religious history: ~
 Thus, Hinduism came into existence with its own code of conduct beliefs, rituals after the 8th century. Hinduism, as one knows today, is of recent origin.
The “Hinduism did not really achieve its status as a coherent though still baffling, religious complex until after the establishment of the British rule in India.
Hindus are not in contact with their religious history therefore, they believe their inherited beliefs as the ultimate truth.
Hindus traditionalists refuse to debate whether the Vedic people practiced cow slaughter ate beef. They believe such debate is irreligious.
In discussing the Vedic religion it is also to be remembered that in the course of history, many non-Aryan elements entered into the Vedic religion. The Vedic Aryans freely borrowed elements from the culture and the society around them. But we cannot say with precision, which are the non-Aryan elements in the Vedic Religion.
To be considered an orthodox Hindu one need only accept the authority of Shruti, however, there is no universal agreement among Hindus what constitutes Shruti. Vedantins consider the Vedanta, i.e., the Upanishads as Shruti but also include the Bhagavad-Gita and Brahma Sutras as authoritative. For some Vaishnavas, the Bhagavata Purana is to be considered Veda. Some consider the Tantras are considered Veda. Thus, we find that there is ample scope for different ideologies, philosophies, and practices under the very broad umbrella of Hinduism.
Hindus indulge non-Vedic beliefs such as idolatry, ancestor worship, pilgrimages, priestcraft, offerings made in temples, the caste system, untouchability and child marriages. All these lack Vedic sanctions, therefore, Hinduism is not Ancient Vedic Religion or Santana Dharma.
Vedas are not the important sacred scriptures for the Hindus. The Vedas as a body of scripture contains many contradictions and they are fragmentary in nature. For most Hindus of today, scriptures like the Bhagavad-Gita, Ramayana, Mahabharata, and Puranas are more attractive and appealing than the Vedas. In addition, the Gods and Goddesses they worship differ considerably from the Vedic ones.

The collection of hymns called Vedas are written in praise of certain deities by poets over several centuries does not seem to have much significance for the Hindus of today. Most Vedic Gods do not find a place in Hinduism.

Vedic religion or Santana Dharma is distinct from HinduismThe Vedic religion or Santana Dharma deserves to be treated on its own as a distinct religion with its own sacred texts, rites, rules of social life, beliefs and practices without interlinking it with Hinduism. Perhaps it is right to maintain that the Mimamsa School which is concerned with the investigation of the Vedic texts, their correct interpretation and the meticulous performance of the Vedic rituals and ceremonies has preserved and defended a part of the heritage of the Vedic tradition.

The Vedanta school also may have received a part of the inspiration from the Vedas. For the rest of the Hindu philosophical schools and religious sects, the influence of the Vedas is nominal. However, in as much as elements from the Vedas have influenced some aspects of Hinduism, it may be considered as one of the many factors influencing modern Hinduism.

But by no means can it be maintained that Hinduism has its direct ancestry in the Vedic religion or Santana Dharma. Therefore, Hinduism of Vedic times is an imagined community. Hinduism is of a much later origin, and a historical view of Indian religions would endorse a dichotomy between Vedic religion or Santana Dharma and contemporary Hinduism.

Hinduism does not have a long ancestry as is often presumed or propagated by the Hindu ideologues. In fact, historically, religions like Buddhism and Jainism can claim greater antiquity than the Hinduism of today. Hinduism began to take a systematic form from the time of Sage Sri, Sankara (8th century A.D). In this sense, he may be considered as the ‘founder’ of Hinduism but Sage Sri, Sankara's time it was not called Hinduism because there is no reference word Hindu in any ancient literature.  

Thus, Hinduism came into existence with its own code of conduct beliefs, rituals after the 8th century.    Hinduism as one knows today is of recent origin. He states: “Hinduism did not really achieve its status as a coherent, though still baffling, religious complex until after the establishment of the British rule in India.

In discussing the Vedic religion, it is also to be remembered that in the course of history, many non-Aryan elements entered into the Vedic religion. The Vedic Aryans freely borrowed elements from the culture and the society around them. But we cannot say with precision, which are the non-Aryan elements in the Vedic religion. Therefore, the thesis of the direct ancestry of Hinduism of today from Vedic religion is to be considered as a myth purported by orthodoxy.

Temple worship, pilgrimages, the Gods, and Goddesses are important to the Hindus. Hindu Gods are Sri, Rama, Sri, Krishna, Sri, Kali, Sri, Ganesh, Sri, Hanuman, Brahma, Vishnu, Shiva and the respective consorts of the last three, namely, Saraswati, Lakshmi, and Shakti. None of these deities figured prominently in the Vedic pantheon and some of them are clearly non-Vedic.

The major Gods of Hinduism like Vishnu and Shiva are non-Aryan in origin. Though they may have belonged to the Vedic tradition they played no major role in the Vedas. The more important religious sects among the Hindus, like Vaishnavism, Saivism and so on, did not have a Vedic origin but had come into existence in very many recent times.

Originally Shiva and the cult of the Mother Goddess belonged to the religion of the Indus Valley people. As one goes in deeper in the annals of the Indian religious history  Vishnu and Shiva cult is a melting of at least two cultures, if not three, namely, the Aryan culture, the pre-Aryan culture of the Ganges Valley and the Indus Valley culture. These three cultures were closely knit by the first century of Christianity and in the later period underwent further developments, and probably also a fourth tradition of the indigenous tribes that stood outside the four classes of the caste system as outcastes.

Vedic worshippers did not use temples and idols as Hindus of today do. For them, the sacrificial rituals were more important than the temple or idol worship the major Hindu feasts of today are based on the epic feats of Rama and Krishna and the Puranic lore pertaining to Shiva and the Goddess.

Remember:~

Hindus are idol worshipers of a large number of Gods and Goddesses whereas in Vedas the God is ONE. God is the Supreme Spirit

As one goes deeper into the annals of history, it indicates the fact that somewhere someone has added the Puranas in the name of Veda Vyasa the grandmaster of the Vedas. It is impossible to accept and believe that Veda Vyasa authored and introduced the Puranas which has all conceptual Gods because:-

Therefore, the thesis of the direct ancestry of Hinduism of today from Vedic religion is to be considered as a myth purported by orthodoxy.
Vedic religion or Santana Dharma is distinct from Hinduism. The Vedic religion or Santana Dharma deserves to be treated on its own as a distinct religion with its own sacred texts, rites, rules of social life, beliefs and practices without inter-linking it with Hinduism. Perhaps it is right to maintain that the Mimamsa School which is concerned with the investigation of the Vedic texts, their correct interpretation and the meticulous performance of the Vedic rituals and ceremonies has preserved and defended a part of the heritage of the Vedic tradition.
The Vedanta school also may have received a part of the inspiration from the Vedas. For the rest of the Hindu philosophical schools and religious sects, the influence of the Vedas is nominal. However, in as much as elements from the Vedas have influenced some aspects of Hinduism, it may be considered as one of the many factors influencing Hinduism.
But by no means can it be maintained that Hinduism has its direct ancestry in the Vedic religion or Santana Dharma. Therefore, Hinduism of Vedic times is an imagined community. Hinduism is of a much later origin, and a historical view of Indian religions would endorse a dichotomy between Vedic religion or Santana Dharma and contemporary Hinduism.
Hinduism does not have a long ancestry as is often presumed or propagated by the Hindu ideologues. In fact, historically, religions like Buddhism and Jainism can claim greater antiquity than the Hinduism of today. Hinduism began to take a systematic form from the time of Sage Sri, Sankara (8thcentury A.D). In this sense, he may be considered as the ‘founder’ of Hinduism.

Remember:~
Hindus are idol worshipers of a large number of non-Vedic God s and Goddesses whereas Vedic God is Atman the 'Self'.
In Vedas, God has been described as:~

Yajurveda – chapter- 32:~ God is Supreme Spirit has no ‘Pratima’ (idol) or material shape. He cannot be seen directly by anyone. He pervades all beings and all directions. 

Thus,   Idolatry does not find any support from the Vedas.

Rig Veda: ~ 'Prajnanam Brahma'- Consciousness is the ultimate reality or Brahman or God in truth.

God in truth is the Atman, the Self. Atman is present in the form of consciousness.

Do not accept any other God other than Atman not worship other than Atman.

Let these words be inscribed in your subconscious.

Nothing is real but God. Nothing Matters but love for God in truth. God in truth is everywhere and in everything.

God in truth is hidden by the illusory universe. God in truth alone is and all else is an illusion
Rig Veda: ~ The Atman is the cause; Atman is the support of all that exists in this universe. May ye never turn away from the Atman, the Self. May ye never accept another God in place of the Atman nor worship other than the Atman?" (10:48, 5)
When Rig Veda says  May ye never accept another God in place of the Atman nor worship other than the Atman? Thus, to know the real God Self-realization is necessary. Self-realization is God-realization. Self-realization itself is real worship.
When Upanishads and Vedas declare that, “God is present in the form of the Athma, and God is indeed Athma itself” then why accept another God in place of the Atman nor worship other than the Atman.

The Hindus today are non-Vedic. The Vedic religion or Santana Dharma does not exist. The Vedic Culture and Vedas are complete in themselves but Hinduism which is a non-Vedic belief system with all its ritual and conduct-oriented practices has been contributed largely by the priests to suit their convenience!

When we examine the traditions, rituals, and food habits of Hindus, we find that Hinduism is nothing but an amalgamation of Jainism, Buddhism, and Vedic religion.

As we know, a large number of Hindus are vegetarians. Another thing we know is that Vedics were meat-eaters and beef eaters in ancient times. So vegetarianism in Hinduism came from Jainism.

The animal stopped this ritual because of strong opposition by Jains and Buddhists. Compassion for animals in Hinduism came from Jainism and Buddhism, and sacrificing animals came from the Vedic religion. Sacrifice was one of the most important rituals in the Vedic religion. Vedic’s

Vedics were not idol worshipers. Idol worshiping in Hinduism came from Jainism. The saffron color is considered holy in Hinduism. But it came there from Buddhism. On the other hand, the importance of the white color in Hinduism came from Jainism.

The importance of 4 rainy months (Chaturmas) in Hinduism came from Jainism and Buddhism. The importance of fasting came from Jainism.

Thus, we can see many Jain and Buddhist elements in present-day Hinduism, followed by some Vedic elements.

Remember:~

Reincarnation was not a Vedic belief. Belief in reincarnation which is central to Hinduism of today is not really attested to in the Vedas, though they hint at life after death. The doctrine of transmigration as elaborated in Hinduism has no place in the Vedic hymns”. In the early Vedic literature, there is no express mention of the doctrine of transmigration.

It is in the Upanishads that it appears for the first time. The Rig Veda speaks of two paths for the Souls of the deceased, namely, the path of the Gods (devayana) and the path of the fathers (pitriyana). Those who go by the former enjoy immortality and there is no return to physical life after that.

In fact, the Vedic man longed for this state of life. Whereas those who go by the latter path, unite with the fathers and then return to earth, after having enjoyed the fruits of his deeds.

Rig Veda ― consisting of about 10,500 verses ― there is only one occasion where there is mention of a return to this world after death. What is implied here is that it cannot be taken as important teaching of the Rig Veda.

The Avatara and caste system are not Vedic in origin. The theory of Avatara (‘descend’) of Gods which is very important to modern Hinduism is non-Vedic. The term Avatara (…) is not found in the earlier Vedic texts and is absent from the older Sanskrit glossaries”.

When Upanishads and Vedas declare that “God is present in the form of the Athma, and God is indeed Athma itself” then why to accept another God in place of the Atman nor worship other than the Atman thus the Hinduism is a group of non-Vedic belief system founded by different founders of castes and creed. :~Santthosh Kumaar 

Saturday, January 24, 2015

Unconsciousness can only be the consciousness without objects; otherwise it has no meaning.+


Man and his experience of the world are present only in the duality. The duality is present in the form of the mind. The Mind is present in the form of the universe and the universe appears as waking or dream (duality) and disappears as deep sleep (nonduality).

One cannot live without the physical world; it is the basis of his life.  The physical world is within the waking experience.   The same way the dream world and the dream entity exist within the dream.  The dream entity and the dream world are a reality within the dream. Similarly, the waking entity and the waking world are a  reality within the waking experience.  The dream becomes unreal when the waking takes place, and the waking remains as reality till the ignorance is there. The ignorance will prevail until the waking entity remains unaware of the existence of the formless witness. 

The seeker has to trace the formless witness of the three states, to realize the fact that,  the self is neither the waking entity nor the Self is the dream entity, but the Self is the formless soul that witnesses the coming and going of the three states.

So it is the starting point of his spiritual quest. Proof, not imaginations, must be the seekers’ material. 

Remember:~

Unconsciousness can only be consciousness without objects; otherwise, it has no meaning. Therefore,  it is really and somehow consciousness.  Through the study of the mind, one gradually becomes aware “The Unconscious" which is at the back of it all, is the Soul.

One has yet to learn that he cannot look into the mind of another nor into that of animals. Hence, those scientists who describe how ants think, for instance, are merely drawing inferences, not ascertaining proved facts.

That which one knows best in the waking experience, that which is nearest to his, that of which he can never be free, its existence is supremely certain, is his consciousness.

One may doubt anything else, but he directly perceives his-self. Hence, one has to begin the study of the truth with the study of the consciousness, not, as is mistakenly done by theologians, metaphysicians with the supposed Absolute.

All gold ornaments are made of this same single material, so to explain the nature of the unknown soul, one has to start with something known and familiar, viz. consciousness, which he has in the three states, and proceed step by step from that onwards.

One knows the Self (Soul), it is directly perceived, and thinking implies a thinking capacity, i.e. a thinker. This Self (Soul) is consciousness. After showing that this consciousness, this Self (Soul), is the ultimate reality, and everything else is of the same nature which should enable one henceforth to understand all else also is consciousness. Everyone has and knows this consciousness; therefore, it is a universal datum. It is something that everybody can grasp.

The Mind and its substance, and the mind as a whole are two different things that have to be investigated.  The Mind does not depend on merely the size of the physical brain. The elephant has the largest animal brain, yet it is no more intelligent than the man, who has a much smaller brain.

If, as some think, the interaction of material brain atoms produces the mind as a by-product, the reply for this is that one cannot know this unless someone had seen it happen. However, nobody has yet seen it. This theory is based on mere speculation.

One knows only the mind is limited to his physical activity, but the truth is the whole physical existence, which is full of action or inaction is the mind.  If one limits the mind to his physical entity, he will never be able to move towards ultimate understanding.  The Mind appears as the waking and the dream.  The Man and his world are within the waking or the dream.  Thus, the mind is the whole physical existence.  Thus, one has to consider the mind as the whole physical existence. By considering the mind as the physical existence, the waking and the dream also are considered as the mind.

What is the mind? What does it does and what it is capable of doing? No one knows it in itself. Philosophers and intellectuals who regard the mind as only power or as an activity do not really say what it is when appearing to define it, even though they use a million words.  Their study is correct up to a certain level, but they have not gone very deep verifying the facts.

Remember:~

One may think of the mind as he likes, but he gets only a thought, i.e. he gets words, more words. He does not get the mind itself. Philosophers go on spinning yarns about the mind but have never seen it. Their words are only imaginations.  How can one see the mind when philosophers and their experience of the world exist within the mind?  When the mind disappears they and their experience of the world also disappear.  Therefore, deeper self-search is required to analyze the mind.  Then only it is possible to move forward in pursuit of truth. 

Punditry is not the philosophy. Much of what they say may be true but true only as thoughts, but they have to inquire what a thought is, and then they have to go beyond it. What about the witness, which witnesses all these three states, which comes and goes.  No philosopher has even been able to define the meaning of the 'mind' and 'consciousness'.

One does not know the dimensions of the mind. All the form, time, space is within the mind only, not outside of it.  One as an individual can imagine anything within the mind.

The terms "Super Consciousness",  "Overmind" etc. belong to irrational mysticism. No one can measure awareness which is consciousness and say where it stops, therefore, the mind is called limitless; hence to talk of something beyond it is sheer imagination. One has to appeal only to the facts, not imagination.

People who talk of brain consciousness are talking emptily. One does not know what it is, nor what “brainless consciousness” is. One is aware of only consciousness. Science does not know the true relation between consciousness and the brain if any.

One knows only 'mental states. Only three final mental states,  that is the waking, the dream, and the deep sleep~ which come and go.:~Santthosh Kumaar